Archive

Archive for the ‘Non-Technical Commentary’ Category

Federal Government: Ignoring what we learned 5,000 years ago

January 20th, 2010

Being a volunteer EMT, and at times an outdoorsy-type person, I occasionally get emails from friends about disaster-related topics. Especially in the post-9/11 days. Recently, I got an email asking me if I’d seen the Department of Homeland Security’s disaster preparedness site, ready.gov. I’d heard a bit about it, but hadn’t really looked around. The site’s main premise is to educate people about how to prepare for a disaster – “get a kit”, “make a plan”, “be informed”.

The site’s own About page states that it is “designed to educate and empower Americans to prepare for and respond to emergencies including natural and man-made disasters. The goal of the campaign is to get the public involved and ultimately to increase the level of basic preparedness across the nation.”

The first step on the site, “Get a Kit”, includes a list of supplies to have on hand as a basic disaster kit. The introduction to the page reads:

You may need to survive on your own after an emergency. This means having your own food, water, and other supplies in sufficient quantity to last for at least three days. Local officials and relief workers will be on the scene after a disaster, but they cannot reach everyone immediately. You could get help in hours, or it might take days. In addition, basic services such as electricity, gas, water, sewage treatment, and telephones may be cut off for days, or even a week or longer.

.

I will admit, I assumed this would be geared more towards urbanites, not those of us in the suburbs or rural America (the latter generally being more accustomed to self-sufficiency), so I adjusted my expectations accordingly. At first glance, it seems to include most of the things that the EMT in me would want it to:

  • Food and water
  • First aid kit
  • Wrench or pliers to turn off gas line
  • Prescription medications
  • Bleach (as a disinfectant and for water purification)
  • Fire extinguisher
  • Matches

However, I found a number of things obviously missing. Sure, some are minor – matches but no mention of fuel, bleach but not even coffee filters to remove particulate matter from water. I also find it comical that so many years after the Cold War “Duck and Cover” approach to nuclear safety, the government is now telling people to Shelter-In-Place in the event of a biological attack – by covering their doors and windows with plastic sheeting!

But by far the most egregious omission from the list – something learned by man at least 5,000 years ago, and taught to every Boy Scout – is the simplest tool: a knife. Yup, that’s right, the Disaster Kit list doesn’t include any variety of cutting implement. I don’t know if whoever wrote up the list is just scared of getting sued when little Bobby finds the knife and kills himself, or whether they’re really that stupid. But I, for one, never leave my house without some variety of the oldest real tool devised by man, and can’t imagine anyone thrown into any sort of “survival” situation without at least a rudimentary way to cut, scrape, pry, etc. I’d say that if I were without utilities or organized public safety for “at least three days”, I’d sure want to be able to make simple repairs, fashion simple tools, or perhaps cut something.

On another (albeit less important) note, there are still many, many Americans, not just in rural areas, who have a fireplace or wood stove. What about a few days’ worth of wood?

EMS, Non-Technical Commentary , , ,

Priorities

November 4th, 2008

Why is it that Rutgers cancels classes hours before a football game, and surely would if there were classes during Super Bowl times… but both of my classes were scheduled to meet on election night???

Non-Technical Commentary ,

Switch Shopping; the Law of Gross Tonnage

April 2nd, 2008

Well, I’m shopping for a new switch. But first, a small aside:

I drive a Ford F-250. It’s a pretty big truck. And every once in a while, someone cuts me off in something like a Honda Fit. It really makes me stop and wonder – how stupid are they? I’ll admit that after two and a half years of driving a 13,000 pound ambulance in my spare time, I know a bit about the maneuverability problems of large vehicles. But I have to assume that the average driver, when confronted with something like my truck – 6500 pounds empty, 21 feet long and tall enough that the hood is at the level of the roof of most passenger cars – they’d think twice about doing something stupid. I won’t even mention the people who cut off or tailgate dump trucks and semi’s.

I’ve spent a bit of time on the water throughout my life. Piloting a boat isn’t especially difficult, but there are a few things you learn about navigation. One of them is affectionately known as The Law of Gross Tonnage. It’s really simple. Big things take a long time to stop, and can’t maneuver very well. So stay out of their way. So I have to wonder, why don’t they include this in driver’s manuals? Sure, people do stupid things. Some people just have to, it’s part of their nature. But if they’re going to, why can’t they be smart, and choose to do it in front (or behind) of a vehicle that actually has a chance of stopping?

In other news, I’m starting to shop for a new switch. At the moment, my network at home (hosting this blog/site and everything else) is running on a single, ancient, Rutgers University surplus Bay Networks BaySTack 450-24T. It’s served me well (and it server Rutgers well before me) but it’s time for an upgrade. While it’s a manageable switch, it’s only capable of 100Base-TX. And streaming a few gigs of backups over it every night isn’t fun, not to mention attempting a network install of a full OS.

So, it’s time to shop for a new switch. Depending on budget, I’ve identified two possible configurations:

  1. Get a new 10/100 manageable switch for the main network, and buy a desktop 8- to 12-port Gigabit Ethernet switch for a dedicated backup LAN.
  2. Bite the bullet and buy a Gigabit manageable switch.

If possible, I’m leaning towards the second option. My budget puts me in the market for what are normally considered edge switches, and Gigabit is just arriving in that land (heck, the dictionary in my browser doesn’t even know it’s a word). The bottom line is that it’s going to be a long time before anything faster than Gigabit makes it to most desktops. So, I’m distinctly aware of the possibility of needing a manageable switch and eventually implementing 802.1ad link aggregation to increase bandwidth to the backup server and other key machines.

The major features I’m interested in:

  • 19″ rack mount form factor, at least 16 ports (24 would be good) all at Gigabit speeds.
  • Something from a good manufacturer, not a white-box or house brand. Good support.
  • Extensive manageability – at a minimum, SNMP and Telnet. Hopefully RMON.
  • 802.1Q VLANS
  • Good options for firmware upgrades, and not anything that requires a service contract (i.e. Cisco).
  • 802.3ad Link Aggregation (at a minimum, supporting 3 systems with 2-4 links each).
  • Port mirroring.
  • Support for QoS/CoS – at a minimum, 802.1p.
  • Acceptable MTBF.

Some added bonuses that I’d really like:

  • Support for syslog to a separate machine.
  • SFP slots so I can move to a faster backbone switch in the future, or move key systems to fiber or a faster standard.
  • Even more management – SSH would be nice, as would RADIUS or TATACS authentication.
  • A good switch fabric capacity – 32Gbps or higher for a 24-port.
  • 802.3af Power over Ethernet. (Well, I could always use injectors)
  • MAC filtering, ACLs, and/or 802.1x NAC.
  • 802.1ab LLDP.

I’ll keep looking around and pricing things out. My hard budget is $500, but it would take a lot to get me to spend that much. I’m probably looking for something closer to the $300 range, probably lightly used or refurbished. If anyone happens to see this and has a suggestion, feel free to share!

Ideas and Rants, Miscellaneous Geek Stuff, Non-Technical Commentary , ,